TM
February 12, 2026
|
14 min read


A website relaunch is rarely "just" a new layout. It often involves brand, content, technology, processes – and the signals Google has learned over the years.
Typical triggers include: too few inquiries, an outdated CMS, weak performance, or a brand that has evolved. The biggest risks lie in SEO losses due to URL changes, overlooked content, and lack of coordination.
If you plan carefully, you gain something very valuable in return: more clarity, better user guidance, higher conversion, measurable performance – and a website that's easier to maintain long-term.
SEO Migration
UX
Content Audit
Performance
Accessibility
Redirects
Core Web Vitals
CMS Change
Tracking
Green Web
When we talk to teams about a relaunch, we often hear first: "We need a fresh design." And yes: First impressions count. But a relaunch is not the moment you just change colors – it's the moment you reorganize the whole house.
Definition as we use in projects: A website relaunch is the comprehensive reimplementation of a website – usually with changes in structure, content, design, and technology. A redesign is often just a visual overhaul. Many guides draw this line as well: During a relaunch, there's a "reintroduction in all areas." Ramoser Webdesign
The difference is practically relevant because it determines how much risk and how much impact you bring to the project. A pure redesign can be cautious. A relaunch can be a fresh start – and it can be great if you know what you're doing.
We see relaunches as a translation: You translate your current business, brand, and offering into a digital form that people immediately understand. This involves things like information architecture, texts, interactions, forms, load time, tracking – and also Google.
An easy guiding question that we ask in almost every project helps us (our Method 1): "What should be easier for users after the relaunch than before?" If you don't have a clear answer to that, the relaunch quickly turns into a matter of taste.
And something else that's often underestimated: The website is the most important marketing channel for many companies. 91 percent of companies say exactly that. Digital Silk If the website is so important, then a relaunch is not cosmetic – it's a strategic decision.
There is a moment we almost always experience in relaunch pre-discussions: Someone in the team says, "The site still works." And someone else says, "Yes, but it's working against us." The truth lies exactly between these two sentences.
A relaunch rarely pays off because something is "old." It's worth it when costs, risks, or missed opportunities outweigh the investment.
A strong signal is conversion: Many relaunches start because the website doesn't close enough deals. In a survey, 80.8 percent stated that a too low conversion rate was the trigger. Sixth City Marketing In practice, this shows as: Traffic is there, but inquiries are missing. Or inquiries come, but they are the wrong ones.
A second signal is patience. If a page takes longer than three seconds to load, about 40 percent of visitors leave it again. Sixth City Marketing This is not a "performance issue," but a trust and relationship issue. Nobody likes to wait.
Then there are the silent signals: editorial work takes forever because the CMS is cumbersome. Tracking is unreliable. The site is not accessible, even though since 2025 many sectors have been much more obligated due to the European Accessibility Act (even if details vary depending on the offering and target audience).
Here comes our Method 2, which works surprisingly well in many projects: "Keep what works – renew what slows you down." It sounds simple, but it's a real antidote to activism.
We look with you at three things: What demonstrably brings leads or trust (e.g., pages that organically sustain over years)? What continuously causes friction (e.g., load time, maintenance, bounce rates)? And what no longer fits your brand (e.g., tonality, images, positioning)? From this, a clear plan often emerges: Sometimes it's a relaunch. Sometimes it's a focused redesign plus technical renovation.
What's important is: A relaunch is not a mandatory program every two years – but many companies revise their websites in 2–3-year cycles. Walker Sands If you wait significantly longer, it usually doesn't get cheaper, but more confusing.


Design is visible – but the reasons relaunches falter are usually invisible: unclear goals, missing data, too many opinions, too little responsibility.
Before we move into implementation, we need a shared vision of what "good" actually means. And in such a way that you can check it after the launch.
We like to work with a small selection of KPIs that together form a complete picture. Not because numbers are everything – but because they relax discussions.
First: Business Impact. These can be inquiries, demo bookings, newsletter opt-ins, or sales. Many teams start relaunches for conversion reasons; this is measurable and legitimate. Sixth City Marketing
Second: Visibility. Which pages currently bring organic traffic? Which search queries are valuable? For this, Google Search Console is worth gold.
Third: Experience. We don't mean "Do we like it", but: Do people find what they are looking for faster? Do they have fewer interruptions? Do they stay longer? Qualitative signals such as support tickets, feedback from sales conversations, or small user tests also help here.
Fourth: Trust. 75 percent of users judge a company's credibility based on web design. Sixth City Marketing Trust is reflected in contact rates, repeat visits, and willingness to share data.
So you don't just hope it will get better, we use a simple routine in relaunches (Method 3): We create a Baseline before the project starts. Load times, top landing pages, conversions, visibility, frequent search queries, technical errors. After the relaunch, we measure the same points again – after 1 week (find errors), after 4 weeks (stability), and after 12 weeks (trend).
This takes pressure off the launch day. And it ensures that you don't experience the relaunch as a one-time event but as a starting point for controlled improvement – that's where long-term impact is created.
Let's quickly clarify whether you need a relaunch or an update.
A relaunch often feels like a jump: old today, new tomorrow. In practice, it's more a sequence of decisions you have to put in order.
We like to structure relaunches into five phases. Not as a rigid process poster, but as a guide, so nothing important is lost "between design and launch."
First, you want to know what you actually have: Which pages exist, which work, which are ballast? Google Search Console and GA4 plus a crawl with Screaming Frog help here. From this inventory, the list of all old URLs also emerges – later the basis for redirects.
Now you arrange the offering so that people understand it. We greatly focus on clarity here: few levels, meaningful URLs, sensible entry points. And we integrate a Pola theme that's missing from many guides: Access for All. Accessibility is not a later refinement; it influences structure, components, and texts from the start.
Design is not decoration but a promise: "You are in the right place, here you reach your goal." The first impression is formed extremely quickly – studies mention 50 milliseconds. Website Optimization That's why we always link design with content and interaction: What should someone do next? What do they need to say yes?
Now it gets technical. CMS, components, templates, performance. And in parallel: content. This is often the bottleneck. If texts, images, downloads, metadata, and internal links are not ready in time, your schedule breaks.
The launch is not the final stroke. We always plan a post-launch phase where we fix errors, check SEO signals, verify tracking, and react to user feedback. This is where it is decided whether the relaunch is not just "online" but also effective.
If you take this as a roadmap, a relaunch suddenly seems less like a risk – and more like a project you can manage.


The SEO fear is real. Not because Google "punishes relaunches," but because a relaunch changes many things that Google has learned as stable over the years: URLs, internal links, content focus, technical signals.
When you introduce new URLs during a relaunch and let old ones disappear, it's initially a loss for Google. Without clear relocation logic, 404 pages appear, signals run empty, backlinks lose their impact. It happens faster than you think.
A prominent example is Frankfurt.de: Despite long planning, the site lost around 50 percent visibility after the relaunch in 2020. factor.partners Our point is not glee, but humility: If such a project can stumble, any can.
Google evaluates pages URL by URL. Each URL collects signals: relevance, links, user signals. If you rename everything, you force Google to learn anew.
And even if you do everything right, it can wobble short-term because a new structure needs to be re-crawled and categorized. That's normal. It's dangerous if the wobbling doesn't stop.
In practice, we see the hardest SEO trap not in server configs but in content: During a relaunch, "clean-up" occurs – and suddenly, the pages that carried organically are missing. Or texts are simplified so much they look nice but no longer answer what people searched for.
Our countermeasure is simple but effective: We treat SEO not as a checklist at the end, but as inventory at the start. Which pages bring traffic? Which search queries bring the right people? If you know this, you can consciously decide what stays, what is combined, and what gets a new, better page.
And yes: A relaunch can also have a positive effect. The domain move from real.de to kaufland.de was executed cleanly and led to growth of over 20 percent. factor.partners This shows: SEO is not fate. It's craftsmanship.
If you take only one "technical" issue seriously in a relaunch, it's this: Movements must be traceable. For people – and for search engines.
For this, we use a practice we internally like to call "URL Accounting." Not because we love numbers, but because they prevent chaos.
1) Crawl everything that exists. With Screaming Frog, export all old URLs, including status codes and metadata.
2) Every important URL gets a destination. That's redirect mapping. Old service page to a new service page, old blog article to a new article or a thematically fitting overview page. We avoid "Everything on the homepage," as that's rarely useful for users and Google.
3) Implement and test 301 redirects server-side. Without 301s, the damage can be brutal: A documented case shows a 66 percent visibility loss and 37,000 euros revenue loss per week caused by missing redirects. SageMedia
4) Monitor closely after launch. In Google Search Console, we check indexing, crawl errors, and sitemaps. In Analytics, we check if conversions and events fire cleanly. And we keep an eye on important keywords – not hourly, but regularly.
SEO migration doesn't only concern Google. A relaunch also breaks links from ads, newsletters, PDFs, social profiles, and partner sites. We therefore compile a brief "link maintenance" list: the 20 most important external locations that need updating post go-live.
We like to plan relaunches so that you don't go live in the middle of the biggest campaign window. A "soft launch" in a quieter week gives you room to catch unexpected effects.
If you consistently follow these four steps, the likelihood is high that your relaunch won't end as an SEO shock but as a clean transition. That's exactly what it's about: no magic – just diligence.


Get a clear redirect plan before go-live.
At Pola, when we talk about performance, we don't just mean "better scores." We mean: less frustration, fewer drop-offs – and less digital waste.
A number we like to use as a reality check: On average, about 6.8 grams of CO₂ are mentioned per page view. analytik.news Whether the value is higher or lower in individual cases depends heavily on data weight, device, and hosting. But the direction is clear: Heavier pages cost energy.
In everyday life, a website often grows unnoticed: new tracking scripts, larger images, additional fonts, embedded videos. Every little request seems harmless. Together, it becomes heavy.
During a relaunch, you have the rare opportunity to consciously reduce. Our approach is very specific:
And: We talk about hosting. If you're moving anyway, it's often a good time to switch to an eco-power or green hosting model. This is not the only adjustment screw – but one that's easy to do when everything is being rebuilt anyway.
For teams, it's helpful to make performance tangible. For this, the Core Web Vitals and tools like PageSpeed Insights or Lighthouse are suitable. The effect is not just "SEO." It's human: If a page responds noticeably faster, it's perceived as more reliable.
And here's a fresh perspective that's rarely found in relaunch checklists: Performance is also an attitude. You decide whether your website respects attention – and whether it respects resources.


Accessibility is often treated as an additional task: "We'll do that later." Our experience is: Later it becomes more expensive – and worse.
Since 2025, accessibility has been much more in focus in Europe, because the European Accessibility Act has shifted from "nice" to "necessary" in many areas. Even if not every company is immediately obligated, expectations have noticeably increased: Users compare. And many people were always there – they were just too often excluded.
During a relaunch, new components arise: buttons, forms, navigation, maps, accordions, cookie banners. These building blocks determine whether a page is operable with a keyboard, whether screen readers make sense of it, and whether contrasts are correct.
If you retrofit this after design, you have to rebuild the foundation. If you plan it from the start, it becomes part of your system.
We like to integrate accessibility into rules, not individual "fixes." Specifically:
1) Contrast and typography are set early, so it's not newly debated for each page later.
2) Components get clear states (focus, hover, error, disabled), so forms don't become stumbling blocks.
3) We test early and simply: with the keyboard, with a screen reader spot-check, with tools like axe DevTools or WAVE. These tools don't replace a full audit, but they prevent typical beginner mistakes.
For us, accessibility isn't a "compliance block," but a matter of respect. And it amazingly fits with conversion: A clear, understandable interface helps everyone – not just people with disabilities.
If you're planning a relaunch, it's the chance to not just say "access for all" but to translate it into navigation, content, and interactions.
The most underestimated part of a relaunch is rarely the design – it's the question: What do we keep, what do we delete, what do we rewrite?
We've seen relaunches that were technically clean but still didn't perform. Not because Google was mean, but because the new content suddenly didn't provide a clear answer anymore.
Many teams have "accumulated" over the years: old landing pages, duplicate service pages, news posts, PDFs. The reflex during a relaunch is then: delete everything, start anew.
Our experience: that's risky. Google often rewards precisely the content that has built trust over time. When you remove these pages, you also remove their signals.
To prevent content decisions from sinking into discussions, we use a simple classification:
1) Carriers: Pages that demonstrably bring traffic, inquiries, or trust. These are migrated and improved with priority.
2) Misleaders: Pages that raise false expectations or are unclear. These are rethought.
3) Ballast: Content without a purpose or outdated offering. These may go – but not without a trace. They need a clean redirect or a conscious "farewell" strategy.
You can support these classes with data: In Google Search Console, you see which URLs are visible for which queries. In GA4, you can see which pages appear in journeys leading to conversions.
Here's a perspective that we as a branding and product team find particularly important: Structure is language. If your website is just a list of menu items, the red thread is missing. If it, however, has a clear dramaturgy, it becomes digital brand leadership.
A relaunch is often the moment when you decide: Do you just want to store information – or do you want to guide people? For purpose brands, this is particularly noticeable: Values don't have to stand in a paragraph, they have to be visible in decisions. For example, in how transparently you speak about impact, how clearly you explain offers, how little distraction you allow.
That's the point where a relaunch truly becomes "new": not just new pages, but new clarity.


Launch day is emotional. For weeks everything is "almost ready," and suddenly it's public. Exactly then the mistakes happen that you'd later prefer to undo: a form that doesn't send. A tracking that counts nothing. A robots.txt that accidentally blocks everything.
To prevent this, we treat the launch like a small, consciously planned handover – not like a moment when you just press "Publish."
We like to keep testing lean but consistent. A good plan doesn't have to be 80 pages long. It just needs to cover the few things that support your business:
1) Test critical journeys (contact, purchase, booking, newsletter) in at least two browsers and on mobile.
2) Verify tracking: Do events align in GA4? Are conversions coming in? Are consent settings correct? A quick check with the browser debugger or the Tag Assistant often helps here.
3) SEO checks after go-live: Crawl, 301 chains, 404, canonicals, sitemap submission in Search Console.
4) Performance spot-check with PageSpeed Insights on the most important page types.
We always plan a stabilization phase after the relaunch. Why? Because rankings may fluctuate, because users do things no team foresaw, and because real use is different from staging.
This attitude is underrepresented in many guides: A relaunch isn't "complete" when it's online. It's complete when it's stable.
And if you want to take some pressure off: Perfection isn't a sensible launch standard. What's important is that the foundations are set. Everything else improves if you measure, observe, and iterate.
This way, a relaunch isn't a torturous effort every two years – but a step towards a website that can live and grow with you.
If you want, we can outline your next steps.
Frequent questions about costs, duration, SEO, CMS, risks, and roles in the team – answered briefly and honestly.
Send us a message or book a non-binding initial consultation – we look forward to getting to know you and your project.
Our plans
Copyright © 2026 Pola
Learn more
Directly to
TM